Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:51
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Private-sector firms added just 37,000 jobs in May, the lowest total in more than two years - CNN
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What caused North Korea to go poor when at first it was rich?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What's a joke you haven't used yet, but are dying to share?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Dozens of Hooters locations abruptly closed: List of latest closures - 9News